Inclusive publication dates: 2025-09-05 through 2026-09-05. Collection occurred during September 5, 2026; later uploads that day remain unknown.
Exact rolling-year cross-check: 2025-09-05T02:54:45.007714+00:00 inclusive to 2026-09-05T02:54:45.007714+00:00 exclusive. Every observed record has identical membership under the inclusive date filter and the exact rolling UTC year. No boundary record is silently added or excluded.
What was counted, and what was watched
All 764 inventoried records have official-channel-checked watch-page publication timestamps in the newer writing corpus. Of those, 421 are inside the requested date window and 343 are older. The existing 100-film moving-image study contributes 80 in-period films and 20 older references. Listing and date verification do not mean every upload was visually inspected.
Fresh anonymous Videos, Shorts and Live listings add no IDs to that inventory. One previously documented uploads-only item is absent from the three tabs; this is not treated as deletion. Private, unavailable and unlisted uploads absent from public listings are outside the inventory.
The thirteen primary technique windows cover ten existing in-period films, with 404 consecutive frames in bounded subsets. One additional recent tutorial, not in the 100-film selection, was investigated with a four-second full-film overview and a 12-second moving excerpt. Its extra native subset contains 60 frames. There remain 410 in-period uploads without a new close inspection in this task.
Six have only in-period citations, three have mixed dates and three have none in period. Historical references remain available in the original playbook; their date status is not silently rewritten.
Existing recipe
Period support
Reuse decision
Original references
title-interface
all
Retain premise/hold/cut, but compare source post-cut scale motion with the fixed-window default.
Both original references are out of period. New in-period prototype evidence supports empty pane before loaded content, not the older chart-build timing.
Both original references are out of period. The new in-period example preserves request identity across a cut but NOT size or screen coordinates; do not claim pixel-matched continuity.
The delivered-site hero holds, the page scrolls through two result sections, then the image-editor context replaces it. The native subset is a hero hold; it does not locate the later cut. This corroborates result holds, scrolling and context cuts rather than establishing a new transition mechanism.
One additional recent tutorial cannot characterize all 341 in-period uploads outside the existing 100-film study. No soundtrack, generated-output reliability or product availability is evaluated.
Limits of the supported vocabulary
This is not a channel-wide cut census or recovered house-style specification. Scene scores are candidates, not cut confirmations. No fitted easing, font identification, soundtrack analysis, product latency or output-reliability benchmark is claimed. Fine timing belongs only to the specifically inspected consecutive windows. Sources outside those windows retain their sampling limits.
The quiet-ending example does not recreate branded letter deletion or knot geometry. FocusType does not claim to demonstrate a source submission. ObjectContext preserves semantic identity, not the older playbook’s exact same-position artifact contract. These are explicit differences, not missing claims disguised as matches.
Compressed waits: coverage gap
The inspected windows establish container arrival, visible progress and result reveals, but do not establish the unedited elapsed time of an application task or a recovered speed-up factor. This chapter therefore does not publish a source-backed compressed-wait recipe. If an original production omits waiting, retain genuine before/after states, label the time compression, and document the capture timestamps during storyboard review. That is a production safeguard, not a measured OpenAI technique here.
Reading holds and pacing
Holds are implemented in every recipe, with completion and reading kept separate from motion. Their frame budgets are chosen defaults, not measured comprehension or a universal source-film cadence. The sequence guide explains where to extend a hold, replace a push with a cut, or simplify a beat against the actual recording. The new recent tutorial corroborates result inspection and scroll/cut structure; it does not close the wait-compression evidence gap.
Additional recent-film inspection
OpenAI, Use ChatGPT Work to build custom creative tools, 133–145 s. The held result scrolls through the delivered page before the editing context returns. The separately decoded 133.5–134.5 s consecutive subset covers the initial hold, not the later cut.