# Review scope: Visit the cited source, then return to the preserved answer

Draft; changes required. A focused Sources control reveals citations; a cited deck opens in another tab, waits through blank navigation, changes slides, then returns to the same answer and open rail. Original UI/data, camera metrics, typography, pointer paths and optical blur differ; no backend-state or exact scroll-preservation claim. Parent-informed sampled still review only; no independent moving or native Resolve approval.

The parent inspected source overview and boundary samples before building, then
sampled actual candidate renders. This was not a fresh independent or blind
review. No perceived moving-source review, native Resolve execution or source-
quality approval is claimed. The fresh complete rendition was decoded at its actual integer PTS. It is not
asserted equivalent to an absent historical master. Research excerpts
are 960×540, while the new outputs are 1920×1080. No source image is a renderer input.

Selected native source interval: [2058,2469),
24000/1001 fps. Intermediate paths and event frames are authored within
sampled source brackets, not recovered product logic or latency measurements.
Source material, production detail and typography are not reproduced exactly.

The two content variants form one candidate. Resolve delivery comprises a manual
construction guide and generated controls, not an executed or verified .drp file.
Existing pinned dependencies support the checks; a clean npm install was not run.