{
  "recipeSha256": "d616e6e6f2c8fc41d0565ec720333fd283cf674a9c6a55a0eaf00a3e2bea7e75",
  "reviewSha256": "b99650a33484df776ac9d51c6fd16440ef35aeef1cf97fd7c7e3cf1a70071b7b",
  "nativeIndexSha256": "5f429c2c3f857ad74bdcc01c568ddd99dc1a230f7ceb1845fcca433ac4545a7f",
  "summary": "Changes required: 2 material and 1 minor findings in both actual review02 variants. Six-lobe source density/topology remains OPEN against the four-lobe original and three-lobe adaptation. The finish now moves in the source-like late direction but has a smaller magnitude and reduced final ink; the original also becomes smaller than its actual review01 endpoint. No density/topology deviation is accepted on the author\u2019s behalf.",
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "WORD-R02-01",
      "severity": "material",
      "status": "open",
      "title": "Four/three-lobe construction still loses source density/topology; endpoint repair reduces ink further",
      "description": "The encoded source has six overlapping lobes at40/source2690 and evolves into an interlaced angular band network. The actual original has four lobes and a separate central aperture; the adaptation has three lobes around its triangular opening. The source-like overlap/crossing network never develops in either. At112/source2762, source bounds are[853,434,1067,646),214x212 with14364 L<128 pixels; original[860,441,1060,639),200x198 with9392; adaptation[865,443,1061,638),196x195 with7660. That is34.6% and46.7% less dark ink than source, with visibly more empty interior. Independent decoding of actual review01 frame112 gives original212x210/9530 pixels and adaptation199x192/8065. The current original loses12px in both dimensions and138 ink pixels; the adaptation loses405 ink pixels, narrows3px and grows3px taller. Its area is essentially unchanged, so it is not accurate to say both adaptation dimensions shrank.",
      "assessment": "OPEN material construction/density deviation, including a measured endpoint ink regression. Original branding is expected; reduced lobes, absent bands and reduced contour density are not automatically acceptable branding changes. A constrained factory and a correct hold do not authorize acceptance."
    },
    {
      "id": "WORD-R02-02",
      "severity": "material",
      "status": "open",
      "title": "Late finishing deformation remains smaller and follows different internal contours",
      "description": "The new finish does continue after the construction phase: through70-112/source2720-2762 its outer lobes and aperture change gradually toward a quiet endpoint. The late direction is now source-like rather than the prior reversed-turn lead. However, consecutive native states70-85 and85-112 still show less reorientation of the substituted lobes and far less internal-band travel than source. As a supporting estimate, same-variant rigid-mask fits from85 to112 around native(960,540) favor+8.25deg for source,+5.5deg for original,+2.25deg for adaptation, with IoUs0.765/0.732/0.520. At70 the fits are substantially poorer, especially adaptation; no exact physical angle is claimed. The difference is visible in the actual moving-playback samples and the consecutive contours, independently of the lobe-count finding.",
      "assessment": "The old direction error is not simply repeated as a current claim. A material trajectory/magnitude residual remains: restoring the late clock and direction has not reproduced the recorded finishing construction. Registration is an estimate on nonrigid rasters, not fidelity proof."
    },
    {
      "id": "WORD-R02-03",
      "severity": "minor",
      "status": "open",
      "title": "Lone O dimensions are repaired, but its counter/ink optics are still different",
      "description": "The old tall/narrow-O description no longer fits these movies. Source and both outputs now have120x120 outer bounds at36-39/source2686-2689, and the x recentering matches at837,858,891,891. The rendered O is1px lower, with a more squared/vertical-sided counter and thicker-looking sides. At38, source has6830 L<128 pixels, original7181 and adaptation7184, about5.1% more ink in the same-sized envelope. The hard switch to the small lobed mark is at40/source2690 in all three.",
      "assessment": "Minor shape/weight residual, not a repeated incorrect aspect-ratio finding. Bundled substitute typography is disclosed, but that disclosure is not optical equivalence."
    }
  ],
  "nativeArchiveGaps": {
    "source": {
      "archived": 111,
      "missingLocalFrames": [
        3,
        4,
        5,
        6,
        7,
        8,
        9,
        10,
        11,
        12,
        13,
        14,
        15,
        16,
        116,
        117,
        118,
        119,
        120,
        121,
        122,
        123,
        129,
        130,
        131,
        132,
        133,
        134,
        135,
        136,
        137,
        138,
        139,
        140,
        141,
        142,
        143,
        144,
        145,
        146
      ]
    },
    "original": {
      "archived": 111,
      "missingLocalFrames": [
        3,
        4,
        5,
        6,
        7,
        8,
        9,
        10,
        11,
        12,
        13,
        14,
        15,
        16,
        116,
        117,
        118,
        119,
        120,
        121,
        122,
        123,
        129,
        130,
        131,
        132,
        133,
        134,
        135,
        136,
        137,
        138,
        139,
        140,
        141,
        142,
        143,
        144,
        145,
        146
      ]
    },
    "adaptation": {
      "archived": 111,
      "missingLocalFrames": [
        3,
        4,
        5,
        6,
        7,
        8,
        9,
        10,
        11,
        12,
        13,
        14,
        15,
        16,
        116,
        117,
        118,
        119,
        120,
        121,
        122,
        123,
        129,
        130,
        131,
        132,
        133,
        134,
        135,
        136,
        137,
        138,
        139,
        140,
        141,
        142,
        143,
        144,
        145,
        146
      ]
    }
  },
  "recipeInspectionLimits": [
    "DRAFT. No self-approval, publication, completed-example credit, or human real-time-viewing claim.",
    "Boundary/intermediate lists are LOCAL frames. Observation sourceFrames are ABSOLUTE film frames. PNG/contact-sheet inspection does not establish continuous playback.",
    "Render only through the main CLI after shared source/scripts have stabilized. No MP4 or sibling manifest is claimed by this generator.",
    "Revision04 reauthors the assigned construction/phase findings. The prior fresh review remains changes-required until main performs a new bound comparison/review; no finding is self-cleared. Earlier canonical exports and evidence must not be rebound or replaced."
  ],
  "claims": {
    "nativeResolveRun": false,
    "movingSourceQualityApproved": false,
    "newSourceFaithfulCompletion": false,
    "upstreamStaticTiesCreditedAsOwnWin": false
  },
  "scope": "Inherited findings, not a fresh review. New all-frame decoding does not fill the historical PNG archive or clear source-quality findings."
}