{
  "freshContext": true,
  "labelsStripped": true,
  "comparedMovingSource": false,
  "outcomes": [
    "tie",
    "tie"
  ],
  "findings": [],
  "originalSha256": "09671ec4c7bf0980d33a23abc8db3e1c0e5312a7ccc0699a6c181a8e0a33c8b8",
  "adaptationSha256": "4976eaab4a7c074230ee5bcc733071e84b16155c6fbf98b81fb69a6f206f4e57",
  "projectSha256": "3d1b5a35df2055549725bb97fc3edc4cddd7e4f57ff4d59beafa2be663239b8d",
  "sourceSha256": "2de7005918a4a205d104065f635cae7b736767e939a2dd3965f1559ae211f9ca",
  "reviewReportSha256": "ae11675debfa5df97d808f9bb814b1858f929b3cff07daa505a97fd752f076c0",
  "frozenAt": "2026-09-13T04:02:05Z",
  "coverage": {
    "files": 4,
    "framesPerFile": 22,
    "fullFrameInstancesInspected": 88,
    "nativePixels": [
      900,
      280
    ],
    "allConsecutiveTransitionsChecked": true,
    "temporallyPerceivedVideo": false
  },
  "reasons": [
    "No material comparative defect established. Both sides show the same local state-change sequence and caret schedule. Different wording, palette, icon drawing and small raster differences do not support a forced winner.",
    "Independent inspection did not establish a material loser. A and B place the placeholder/plus replacement and both visible caret phases on the same native frames. The warmer treatment in A and different text are not defects by themselves."
  ],
  "limits": [
    "Only static extracted images were perceived, including every consecutive native frame. No real-time moving-video quality, natural-speed cadence, temporal smoothness or sound-quality claim is made.",
    "The supplied clips last only 0.734067 seconds. No earlier/later behavior or outside-the-crop composition was inspected or inferred.",
    "The native input is 900x280. Enlargements expose existing samples; they do not restore detail from a larger original.",
    "Visible ChatGPT/OpenAI wording in pair-1-A and pair-2-B contrasts with illustrated/original/no-live-product disclaimers in the other sides. This provides source-versus-illustration clues, so the review is not perfectly source-blind. It does not identify a creator.",
    "The packet itself reveals that pair-1-A and pair-2-B share a SHA-256. Both copies were nevertheless decoded and their complete timelines viewed separately. Neither result was inferred transitively from the other pair.",
    "This review binds the retained CFR crop, not the later source-clock remux. All 22 decoded images are unchanged, but temporal approval cannot transfer from static inspection.",
    "The two ties are not candidate wins. Creator labels were hidden, but source identity clues remained."
  ]
}