Show a review step solidifying, then jump-cut to the finished 'Worked for' turn whose summary fills in word by word
Study the source, inspect the editable build, then adapt the treatment to your own content.
What the source does
Local 0 cuts to a document thumbnail with a paragraph beneath it rendered in light grey; over ~f0–9 the words turn solid dark left to right and a small 'Thinking' label appears (~f8). At ~f12 a jump cut lands on the top of the same thread: the user prompt bubble, a 'Worked for 4m 59s' status line, a 'Created the … Draft' link line, and a summary paragraph that again starts grey and solidifies word by word (~f14–30). A composer sits at the bottom and a chart card is pinned at right throughout.
Ghost-to-solid word reveal for streamed text, used twice across a jump cut from an in-progress step to the completed turn.
Phase notes
- Frame 0 — Cut in: thumbnail and grey review paragraph
- Frame 9 — Review paragraph fully solid; 'Thinking' label
- Frame 12 — Jump cut to the completed turn: prompt, status, created link
- Frame 14 — Summary paragraph solidifies word by word
- Frame 30 — Summary solid; hold
Use this example
- Watch the source and draft at normal speed. Compare the order of actions, the held states, and the transition into the result.
- Download the project and read its README before changing inputs. The package includes its implementation and declared dependencies.
- Replace the sample content through the package's documented input or content builder. Keep source footage in the research comparison.
- Render your adaptation and inspect text fit, framing, intermediate states, and entry and exit frames.
The source and remake are different assets. The original code-based illustration remains editable; source footage is a research reference. Read the retained findings below before using the choreography.
Recorded limits
- Visual fidelity is an authored draft judgement from sampled source frames; no independent blind review or native Resolve execution.