Interface sequences · Rendered draft
Outline · hinged leaves and changing occlusion
Study the source, inspect the editable build, then adapt the treatment to your own content.
Use this example
- Watch the source and draft at normal speed. Compare the order of actions, the held states, and the transition into the result.
- Download the project and read its README before changing inputs. The package includes its implementation and declared dependencies.
- Replace the sample content through the package's documented input or content builder. Keep source footage in the research comparison.
- Render your adaptation and inspect text fit, framing, intermediate states, and entry and exit frames.
A runnable draft is not a fidelity approval.
The source and remake are different assets. The original code-based illustration remains editable; source footage is a research reference. Read the retained findings below before using the choreography.
Recorded limits
- The r02 default changes32 lower-corner commands and has a new actual Remotion render. The second content variant remains byte-identical to r01 and is not rerolled. Both preparations and34 tests pass; source-only ZIP has354 files including298 SVGs. The fresh changed-output comparison ties, with no differential quality defect established. Moving quality and complete settling beyond this excerpt remain unverified. Players preserve each retained movie's CFR timestamps. The separate source ledger records33/34ms source quantization; neither a new master extraction nor source-clock identity is claimed. Additional source-boundary context is now checked at150–155: the book still shifts right before the hard cut at153; the next shot holds its background for two frames before Helps appears. This corrects any implication of a stationary ending settle, without altering the frozen source comparisons.
- The existing package is retained unchanged. Local checks verify its bytes, archive, media, and route; no new fidelity approval is asserted.