Motion fieldnotesOpenAI film study
Timing & transitions · Rendered draft

Bring a presenter lower third in as name first, role four frames later, then lose it on the cut

Study the source, inspect the editable build, then adapt the treatment to your own content.

01 / OpenAI source 0:02.8–0:09.4 · Silent research excerpt
02 / Remotion draft Original illustrated content · Editable code

What the source does

The shot hard-cuts in at local 0 to a wide presenter-at-desk frame. The name pops on bottom-left at local ~2 in bold 21 px white; the role pops on ~420 px to the right at ~6 on the same baseline in regular weight. Both hold unchanged until the picture hard-cuts to a close-up at local 156, taking the card with it.

Two-beat lower third: name and role appear as separate pops four frames apart on one baseline, and exit with the picture cut instead of their own animation.

Phase notes

  1. Frame 0 — Cut in to wide presenter shot
  2. Frame 2 — Name pops on
  3. Frame 6 — Role pops on
  4. Frame 156 — Hard cut to close-up, card gone

Use this example

  1. Watch the source and draft at normal speed. Compare the order of actions, the held states, and the transition into the result.
  2. Download the project and read its README before changing inputs. The package includes its implementation and declared dependencies.
  3. Replace the sample content through the package's documented input or content builder. Keep source footage in the research comparison.
  4. Render your adaptation and inspect text fit, framing, intermediate states, and entry and exit frames.
A runnable draft is not a fidelity approval.

The source and remake are different assets. The original code-based illustration remains editable; source footage is a research reference. Read the retained findings below before using the choreography.

Recorded limits

  • Visual fidelity is an authored draft judgement from sampled source frames; no independent blind review or native Resolve execution.

Inspect the original verification record ↗