Motion fieldnotesOpenAI film study
Timing & transitions · Rendered draft

Cut to a white card and type a two-line interview question on, then hold before cutting back

Study the source, inspect the editable build, then adapt the treatment to your own content.

01 / OpenAI source 0:08.7–0:12.1 · Silent research excerpt
02 / Remotion draft Original illustrated content · Editable code

What the source does

The interview footage hard-cuts to a plain white card. From local f1 a bold, centred, two-line question types on character by character with no caret ('Wha' by f3, the first line and 'fo' by ~f23, the full second line by ~f66). The finished question then holds motionless until the card cuts back to footage at f168.

An interstitial question card: hard cut to white, centred two-line type-on with a linear character reveal, then a long static hold.

Phase notes

  1. Frame 0 — White card
  2. Frame 1 — Character type-on begins
  3. Frame 66 — Second line complete
  4. Frame 167 — Hold before cut back

Use this example

  1. Watch the source and draft at normal speed. Compare the order of actions, the held states, and the transition into the result.
  2. Download the project and read its README before changing inputs. The package includes its implementation and declared dependencies.
  3. Replace the sample content through the package's documented input or content builder. Keep source footage in the research comparison.
  4. Render your adaptation and inspect text fit, framing, intermediate states, and entry and exit frames.
A runnable draft is not a fidelity approval.

The source and remake are different assets. The original code-based illustration remains editable; source footage is a research reference. Read the retained findings below before using the choreography.

Recorded limits

  • Visual fidelity is an authored draft judgement from sampled source frames; no independent blind review or native Resolve execution.

Inspect the original verification record ↗